Some people say that gifted student should be given special learning courses. Other people say that they shoud be taught together.

Some people say that gifted student should be given special learning courses. Other people say that they shoud be taught together. What’s your opinion?

In recent years, education has become the area of focus. Some adopt a view that the educator should offer different programes to talented students; however, to the best of my knowledge, general courses are advised to provide to our students. Discussed below are several reasons that support my perspective.

People should first recognize that not only outstanding students but also low achieving students could enhance their academic results. Through team works, group tasks, normal learners are of great opportunity to learn the studying method of their partner who have better performance than they do. Education system in Euro countries, in which children are instructed altogether, entailing good and equal outcome, could be taken as a particularly salient example of this.

Yet, perhaps the strongest argument in favour of theory is feasibility of establishing a solidarity community. As a result of approaching formal education straightforwardly regardless of learning ability, both participants and their parents may gain life statisfication. Subsequently, uniting population is not beyond the reach of lawmakers.

Despite the above mentioned advantages, it is to bring prolems. On the one hand, distinct students could meet countless barries that limit them from developing their talent. On the other hand, government have less chances to generate specialist in the long run.

In conclusion, besides the potential gains such as increasing the performance of ordinary students and creating harmonious society, eveyone should also pay attention to the presented drawbacks.

In some cultures, the old are more valued.

In some cultures, the old are more valued. However, in other cultures, the young are more valued. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

For long, the elderly assumes essential role in many communities. However, in other cultures, they are given inedequate evaluation, not like the youth is. In the following essay, the differences between the perspectives will be discussed.

On the one hand, senior citizens are of treasured experiences that are accumulative in their whole life. Anecdotal evidence shows that through their wide social relation as well as the interaction with people of dissimilar background, the olders possess practical experiences, valueable lessons that can not be seen in youngsters. Addtionally, in our ever changing society, young adults refer changing job periodicaly. Meanwhile, the recruiters give high weight to experienced applicants whose high commitment to their previous job – which is a very popular among aged groups. For example, the older is respected grouped in Japan culture, due to their life sacrifice, dedication to their career.

On the other hand, they are underestimated in other cultures, seeing that they have less contribution to society in comparation with the youth. Evidently, our life is increasing paced, requiring its members to have good adaptivity. In fact, people of modern generation can qualify more straightforwardly than their previous senior. They are dynamic, intiative, multi-functional, no enjoy the stability, no stike to certain mission like the olders. Futhermore, the phenomenon of giving low assessment to the elderly is partly derived from the greed as nature of human race. On the grounds physical, health limitation, the elder hardly earn as handsome income as their offspiring do. Therefore, consciously youngers show little respects to their senior.

In conclusion, the distinguishing in the role of the olders in cultures could be characteristic and sellfishness. In my opinion, modern citizens should better have wise consideration on the experiences and advices from their parents, earlier counterparts.

Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture.

Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country. An alternative view is that they can adapt to a new environment by establish a minority community. Discuss these two views and give your opinion.

In recent years, population mobility has become increasingly high throughout the world. While some suggest that newcomer should integrate into local cultures, the opponents believe that being a member of minor community, upholding their own traditions is good. In the following essay, the stark contrast between the perspectives will be discussed.

On the one hand, freshmen could easily overcome cultural barriers at the first status. Undeniably, the differences are inherent between people of different nationality. For example, Western citizens are distinguishing from Asian citizens in lifestyles, eat habit. Therefore, throughout the wave of immigration derived from Asian countries, the immigrants should learn and blend into lifestyles of their adopted country. Besides the opportunity of gaining mutual understanding, they could also improve the proficiency of new languages. Increasing the interaction with local, especially in the work place, offer a good practice for newcomer. Also embarrassment is unavoidable for the first time, their efforts will be paid off enriching vocabulary, enhancing grammar of their second languages.

On the other hand, merging into indigenous norms is likely to ruin their customs. By establishing ethenic community, the members are of a feasibility of maintaining their traditional values as well as patriotism to their motherland. Additionally, this also colors cultural diversity of our new destination. The co-existance many cultures generate a pealing attraction to a country. Singapore, where the cross cultural communities have gabbed attention of tourists thanks to a festival, food is a good example of this.

In conclusion, it is a dilemma to evaluate which sugesstion is better. However, in my opinion, the immigrants should adopt local convention for convenience in social life and cherish their traditions at home. This enable them to maitain the beauty of their own cultures and give a hand to the establishment of harmonious society.

It is accepted that family nowadays are not as closed as they used to be.

It is accepted that family nowadays are not as closed as they used to be. What are the reasons and give your recommendation.

In recent years, the increasing gap between family members has become serious. Albeit generally noticeable, this phonomenon has not been recognized by citizen. In the following essay, potential sources as well as suggestion for it will be discussed.

First of all, the rat race is widely recognized as the main reason. In fact, the majority of modern citizens give high weight to personal purposes, spending most of their time on earning handsome income, climbing on the career ladder regardless of the important of close physical interaction with family members. Additionally, another reason has added fuel to the fire is the soaring dominance of exotie cultures. For example, meanwhile parents of Asean countries usually wish to pass on traditional values to their children, such youngsters have a bias to adopt Western lifestyles. Therefore, the contrary in perception between people of different generation should be taken into account.

In order to tickle this problem, we should first conference with its root causes. At the heart of the matter is individuals awareness. To the elderly, they are advised to learn the lastest trends that draw attemtion of their children to gain mutual understanding and tolerance. To the youth, they should revive the bygone concept or show respect to family and community. Doing this, the differences between modern citizen and senior citizen will shrink.

Another alternative could be taken by the goverment. The authorities should consider this problem as a social crisis. It is their responbility to introduce education campaigns, improving consciousness of young adults about the irreplace role of family to their life. Futhermore, they could spend money on building public offices, where the free of charge consultant services are available to whom inneed.

In conclusion, the globalization and fast pace of life has been the main producer of bluring relation between family member. Dealing with it requires actions and efforts both citizen and goverment.